Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTalero Sarmiento, Leonardo Hernán
dc.contributor.authorLamos Díaz, Henry
dc.contributor.authorGaravito Hernández, Edwin Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-10T20:05:41Z
dc.date.available2019-05-10T20:05:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-07
dc.identifier.citationTalero Sarmiento, L. H., Lamos Díaz, H. & Garavito Hernández, E. A. (2019). Evaluación de la hipótesis de eficiencia débil y análisis de causalidad en las centrales de abastos de Colombia. Apuntes del CENES, 38(67), 35-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01203053.v38.n67.2019.8040. http://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2576spa
dc.identifier.issnElectrónico 2256-5779
dc.identifier.issn0120-3053spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2576
dc.description1 recurso en línea (páginas 35-62).spa
dc.description.abstractNa Colômbia, existem centros de coleta tradicionais, onde os produtos agrícolas são comercializados e distribuídos, o preço de venda desses produtos é publicado por instituições governamentais em relatórios semanais. Para determinar se as séries de preços seguem um passeio aleatório e se existem relações entre os centros, são aplicados seis testes que avaliam a hipótese de eficiência fraca e o teste de causalidade de Granger. Para tanto, é analizado o preço semanal histórico de vinte e oito produtos agrícolas comercializados em seis mercados, durante a primeira semana de 2013 até a última semana de 2017. Os principais resultados indicam que os mercados tendem para a eficiência, embora não tenham o mesmo nível porquanto a eficiência varia de acordo com o produto que é comercializado. Além disso, os centros de Manizales, Barranquilla e Villavicencio influenciam os preços dos mercados de Bogotá, Bucaramanga e Medellín.por
dc.description.abstractIn Colombia, there are traditional food supply centers to trade agricultural products. Government institutions publish sale prices of these products in weekly reports. In order to determine the random characteristics of these price series and if there are relationships between the centers, we use a battery of six different tests to examine the weak form of efficient market hypothesis and the Granger causality test. For this, this work collected the historical weekly price of 28 agricultural products, taking into account six markets, during the first week of 2013 to the last week of 2017. The main results indicate that markets tend towards efficiency, however, the efficiency depends on the product traded. In addition, the centers in Manizales, Barranquilla and Villavicencio influence the prices of the Bogotá, Bucaramanga and Medellín markets.eng
dc.description.abstractEn Colombia existen centros tradicionales de acopio donde se comercializan y distribuyen productos agrícolas. El precio de venta de estos productos es publicado por instituciones del Gobierno en informes semanales. Con el objetivo de determinar si las series de precios siguen una caminata aleatoria y si existen relaciones entre los centros, se aplican seis pruebas que evalúan la hipótesis de eficiencia débil y la prueba de causalidad de Granger. Para ello se analiza el precio histórico semanal de 28 productos agrícolas comercializados en seis mercados, durante la primera semana de 2013 a la última de 2017. Los principales resultados indican que los mercados tienden a la eficiencia, aunque no tienen el mismo nivel, ya que esta varía según el producto que se comercialice. Además, los centros en Manizales, Barranquilla y Villavicencio influyen sobre los precios de los mercados de Bogotá, Bucaramanga y Medellín.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiaspa
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2019 Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cenes/article/view/8040/7610spa
dc.titleEvaluación de la hipótesis de eficiencia débil y análisis de causalidad en las centrales de abastos de Colombiaspa
dc.title.alternativeTesting the weak form of efficient market hypothesis and causality analysis in Colombian food supply centerseng
dc.title.alternativeAvaliação da hipótese da eficiência fraca do mercado e análise de causalidade em centros de abastecimento de comida da Colômbiaeng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.description.notesBibliografía y webgrafía: páginas 59-62.spa
dc.description.notesCódigo de Clasificación de Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) :C12, D4, D40, G14, Q13.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.identifier.doi10.19053/01203053.v38.n67.2019.8040
dc.relation.referencesBekkers, E., Brockmeier, M., Francois, J., & Yang, F. (2017). Local Food Prices and International Price Transmission. World Development, 96, 216–230. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.008spa
dc.relation.referencesBenavides, G. (2004). Price Volatility Forecasts for Agricultural Commodities: An Application of Historical Volatility Models, Option Implieds and Composite Approaches for Futures Prices of Corn and Wheat. SSRN Electronic Journal, 3(2), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.611062spa
dc.relation.referencesBouri, E., Chang, T., & Gupta, R. (2017). Testing the Efficiency of the Wine Market Using Unit Root Tests with Sharp and Smooth Breaks. Wine Economics and Policy, 6(2), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2017.06.001spa
dc.relation.referencesCaeiro, F. & Mateus, A. (2014). Randtests: Testing Randomness in R. R Package Version, 1.spa
dc.relation.referencesCárdenas, J. I. & Vallejo, L. E. (2016). Agricultura y desarrollo rural en Colombia 2011-2013: una aproximación. Apuntes del Cenes, 35(62), 87. https://doi. org/10.19053/22565779.4411spa
dc.relation.referencesCoronado, S., Ramírez, M. & Celso, P. L. (2014). Inefficiency in the International Coffee Market: The Case of Colombian Arabica. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(5), 556–561.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeJong, D. N., Nankervis, J. C., Savin, N. E. & Whiteman, C. H. (1992). The Power Problems of Unit Root Test in Time Series with Autoregressive Errors. Journal of Econometrics, 53(1–3), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90090-Espa
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística -DANE-. (2017). Cuentas trimestrales, Colombia. Producto interno bruto (PIB) Boletín técnico cuarto trimestre de 2016. Bogotá: DANE.spa
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Nacional de Planeación -DNP-. (2015). El campo colombiano: un camino hacia el bienestar y la paz. Misión para la transformación del campo. Recuperado de https://www.dnp.gov.co/programas/agricultura/Paginas/Informe-misi%- C3%B3n-FInal.aspx.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuarte-Duarte, J. B. & Mascareñas Pérez-Iñigo, J. M. (2014a). Comprobación de la eficiencia débil en los principales mercados financieros latinoamericanos. Estudios Gerenciales, 30(133), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.05.005spa
dc.relation.referencesDuarte-Duarte, J. B. & Mascareñas Pérez-Iñigo, J. M. M. (2014b). ¿Han sido los mercados bursátiles eficientes informacionalmente? Apuntes del Cenes, 33(57), 117. https://doi.org/10.19053/22565779.2906spa
dc.relation.referencesDuarte-Duarte, J. B., Talero, L. H. & Sierra, K. J. (2017). Evaluation of the Effect of Investor Psychology on an Artificial Stock Market Through its Degree of Efficiency. Contaduría y Administración, 62(4), 1361–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cya.2017.06.014spa
dc.relation.referencesDurbin, J. & Watson, G. S. (1951). Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression. II. Biometrika, 38(1/2), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332325spa
dc.relation.referencesFama, E. F. (1965). The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices. The Journal of Business, 38(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1086/294743spa
dc.relation.referencesFama, E. F. (1991). Efficient Capital Markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575– 1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.xspa
dc.relation.referencesFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO. (2011). Food Price Volatility and the Right to Food. Rome: FAO.spa
dc.relation.referencesGeary, R. C. (1935). The Ratio of the Mean Deviation to the Standard Deviation as a Test of Normality. Biometrika, 27(3–4), 310–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/ biomet/27.3-4.310spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez, H. J. (2011). Política comercial y de competitividad del sector agrícola en Colombia. En Cuadernos Fedesarrollo (ed.), La política comercial del sector agrícola en Colombia (pp. 6–20). Bogotá: Cuadernos Fedesarrollo.spa
dc.relation.referencesGranger, C. W. J. (1986). Developments in the Study of Cointegrated Economic Variables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48(3), 213–228. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1986.mp48003002.xspa
dc.relation.referencesGrossman, S. J. & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 393–408. Retrieved from www. jstor.org/stable/1805228.spa
dc.relation.referencesGujarati, D. N. & Porter, D. C. (2010). Econometría. México: McGraw-Hill.spa
dc.relation.referencesHassan, A., Abdullah, M. S. & Shah, Z. A. (2007). Testing of Random Walks and market efficiency in an emerging market: An empirical analysis of Karachi Stock Exchange. The Business Review, Cambridge, 9(1), 271–280.spa
dc.relation.referencesKarali, B., & Power, G. J. (2013). Short- and Long-Run Determinants of Commodity Price Volatility. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(3), 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas122spa
dc.relation.referencesLachman, J. & Jack, P. (2017). Study of Efficiency and Information Transmission for Agricultural Futures Markets: A Comparative Analysis between Buenos Aires and Chicago Using Monthly and Daily Data. Estudios Economicos, 34(69), 3–23.spa
dc.relation.referencesLevy, R. A. (1967). The Theory of Random Walks: A Survey of Findings. The American Economist, 11(2), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943456701100205spa
dc.relation.referencesLo, A. W. (1991). Long-Term Memory in Stock Market Prices. Econometrica, 59(5), 1279–1313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938368spa
dc.relation.referencesLo, A. W. (2005). Reconciling Efficient Market with Behavioral Finance: The Adaptative Markets Hypothesis. The Journal of Investment Consulting, 7(2), 1–25. https:// doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.728864spa
dc.relation.referencesMalkiel, B. G. (2003). The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164958spa
dc.relation.referencesMinot, N. (2014). Food Price Volatility in Sub-Saharan Africa: Has it Really Increased? Food Policy, 45, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.008spa
dc.relation.referencesNisar, S. & Hanif, M. (2012). Testing Weak Form of Efficient Market Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence from South-Asia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17(4), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.3968/5524spa
dc.relation.referencesPeters, E. E. (2015). Fractal Market Analysis: Applying Chaos Theory to Investment and Economics. Wiley Finance Editions. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=_bkoySKyc_cC&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=(Fractal+Market+ Analysis:+Applying+Chaos+Theory+to+Investment+and+Economics&ots=s- NzltsZ0IO&sig=cnQpI_4F5zlD5blbhNH9omRATmo%5Cnhttp://www.loc.gov/ catdir/description/wiley037/93028spa
dc.relation.referencesPfaff, B. (2008). Analysis of Integrated Series with R and Cointegrated Time. Use R! New York: Springer.spa
dc.relation.referencesResta, M. (2012). Hurst Exponent and its Applications in Time-series Analysis. Recent Patents on Computer Science, 5(3), 211–219. https://doi. org/10.2174/2213275911205030211spa
dc.relation.referencesRuiz-Porras, A. & Ruiz-Robles, B. (2015). La hipótesis de eficiencia y la modelación de series bursátiles mexicanas: un análisis multivariado. Economía Informa, 390, 28–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-0849(15)30003-7spa
dc.relation.referencesSavin, N. E. & White, K. J. (1977). The Durbin-Watson Test for Serial Correlation with Extreme Sample Sizes or Many Regressors. Econometrica, 45(8), 1989. https:// doi.org/10.2307/1914122spa
dc.relation.referencesTalero, L. H., Duarte, J. B. & Garcés, L. D. (2017). La complejidad del mercado bursátil latinoamericano a partir de un modelo autómata celular conductual. Apuntes del Cenes, 36(64), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.19053/01203053.v36.n64.2017.5421spa
dc.relation.referencesTansuchat, R., Chang, C. & McAleer, M. (2009). Modelling Long Memory Volatility in Agricultural Commodity Futures Returns. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1491890spa
dc.relation.referencesTejeda, H. A. & Goodwin, B. K. (2009). Price Volatility, Nonlinearity, and Asymmetric Adjustments in Corn, Soybean, and Cattle Markets: Implications of Ethanol-Driven (Market) Shocks. In 2009 Conference, April 20-21, 2009, St. Louis, Missouri.spa
dc.relation.referencesTillman, J. A. (1975). The Power of the Durbin-Watson Test. Econometrica, 43(5/6), 959. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911337spa
dc.relation.referencesToth, A., Rendall, S., & Reitsma, F. (2016). Resilient Food Systems: A Qualitative Tool for Measuring Food Resilience. Urban Ecosystems, 19(1), 19–43. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11252-015-0489-xspa
dc.relation.referencesVelásquez, J. D. & Aldana, M. A. (2007). Modelado del precio del café colombiano en la bolsa de Nueva York usando redes neuronales artificiales. Recuperado de http:// www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rfnam/v60n2/a16v60n2.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesZeileis, A., & Hothorn, T. (2002). Diagnostic Checking in Regression Relationships. R. News, 2(3), 7-10.spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)spa
dc.subject.armarcCentros de acopio - Investigaciones
dc.subject.armarcMercadeo de productos agrícolas
dc.subject.armarcProducción agropecuaria - Aspectos económicos - Colombia
dc.subject.armarcIndicadores económicos
dc.subject.armarcPrecios agrícolas
dc.subject.armarcAgricultura - Aspectos económicos
dc.subject.proposalPrueba de hipótesisspa
dc.subject.proposalCausalidad de Grangerspa
dc.subject.proposalMicroeconomíaspa
dc.subject.proposalPrecios agrícolasspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalApuntes del CENES;Volumen 38, número 67 (Enero-Junio 2019)spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright (c) 2019 Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright (c) 2019 Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia