Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2851
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Díaz, Joan Sebastián-
dc.contributor.authorCardona, William Andrés-
dc.contributor.authorMonsalve Camacho, Oscar Iván-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-26T22:32:22Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-26T22:32:22Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationGutiérrez Díaz, J. S., Cardona, W. A. & Monsalve Camacho, O. I. (2017). Potencial en el uso de las propiedades químicas como indicadores de calidad de suelo. Una revisión. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas, 11(2), 450-458. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2017v11i2.5719. http://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2851spa
dc.identifier.issn2422-3719-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2851-
dc.description1 recurso en línea (páginas 450-458) : ilustraciones color.spa
dc.description.abstractLa necesidad de entender y evaluar la calidad de los suelos en sistemas de productivos agrícolas es un tema de creciente importancia en la actualidad, debido al interés sobre la determinación de los impactos de las distintas prácticas de manejo en la sostenibilidad del recurso suelo. El objetivo de esta revisión es brindar un panorama general sobre el concepto de calidad de suelo, indicadores para su evaluación y exponer algunas investigaciones realizadas con respecto al potencial de las propiedades químicas para ser usadas como indicadores de calidad de suelos. Entre las propiedades químicas que pueden considerarse como indicadores se encuentran la disponibilidad de nutrimentos, el contenido de carbono orgánico total y carbono orgánico lábil, el pH, la capacidad de fijación de fosfatos, la conductividad eléctrica, la capacidad de intercambio catiónico, contenido de nitrógeno total y mineralizable, y de materia orgánica. Se resalta la importancia de las técnicas multivariantes para definir aquellas propiedades químicas con potencial para ser indicadores de calidad de suelo. La creciente preocupación sobre el uso sostenible del recurso suelo, genera la necesidad de desarrollar enfoques y herramientas que permitan generar diagnósticos acerca de los efectos que tienen las prácticas de manejo implementadas en los sistemas de producción agrícola, es decir, que brinden información acerca de la calidad del suelo en un determinado contexto.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiaspa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas;Volumen 11, número 2 (Julio-Diciembre 2017)-
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2017 Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/5719/pdfspa
dc.titlePotencial en el uso de las propiedades químicas como indicadores de calidad de suelo. Una revisiónspa
dc.title.alternativePotential for the use of chemical properties as indicators of soil quality. A reviewspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAfrifa, E.K., F.A. Armah, A.N.M. Pappoe y P.K. Essandoh. 2011. Assessment of the quality of revegetated soil near an active goldmine in southwestern Ghana. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2, 873-888.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationArnold, R.W., I. Szabolcs y V.O. Targulian. 1990. Global soil change. Report of an International Institute for Applied System Analysis. ISSS, UNEP, Laxenburg, Austria.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationArshad, M.A. y G.M. Coen. 1992. Characterization of soil quality: physical and chemical criteria. Am. J. Alternat. Agr. 7, 25-31. Doi: 10.1017/S0889189300004410spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationArshad, M. y S. Martin. 2002. Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 88, 153-160. Doi: 10.1016/ S0167-8809(01)00252-3spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAstier, M., M. Maass y J. Etchevers. 2002. Derivación de indicadores de calidad de suelos en el contexto de la agricultura sustentable. Agrocienc. 36, 605-620.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAziz, I., M. Ashraf, T. Mahmood, and K.R. Islam. 2011. Crop rotation impact on soil quality. Pak. J. Bot. 43(2), 949-960.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBertini, S.C.B., L.C.B. Azevedo, I. de Carvalho Mendes y E.J.B.N. Cardoso. 2014. Hierarchical partitioning for selection of microbial and chemical indicators of soil quality. Pedobiol. 57(4-6), 293-301. Doi: 10.1016/j. pedobi.2014.06.001spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBrejda, J.J., T.B. Moorman, D.L. Karlen y T.H. Dao. 2000. Identification of Regional Soil Quality Factors and Indicators. I. Central and Southern High Plains. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 2115-2124. Doi: 10.2136/ sssaj2000.6462115xspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCantú, M., A. Becker, J. Bedano y H. Schiavo. 2007. Evaluación de la calidad de suelos mediante el uso de indicadores e índices. Cienc. Suelo 25, 173-178.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChappell, N.A., J.L. Ternan y K. Bidin. 1999. Correlation of physicochemical properties and sub-erosional landforms with aggregate stability variations in a tropical Ultisol disturbed by forestry operations. Soil Till. Res. 50, 55-71. Doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00196-2spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCruz, B., J.E. Barra, R.F. Castillo y C. Gutiérrez. 2004. La calidad del suelo y sus indicadores. Ecosist. 13, 90-97.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDe la Rosa, D. y R. Sobral. 2008. Soil quality and methods for its assessment. Soil Sci. 167-200. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6778-5_9spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDoran, J.W., D.C. Coleman, D.C. Bezdicek y B.A. Stewart. 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality for sustainable environment. Soil Science Society of America. Special Publication 35. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFarfán, F. y E. Hincapié. 2011. Valoración de la sostenibilidad ambiental mediante indicadores de calidad del suelo, en sistemas de producción de café en Colombia. Cenicafé 62(1), 100-118.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFranzluebbers, A.J. y M.A. Arshad. 1996. Water-stable aggregation and organic matter in four soils under conventional and zero tillage. Can. J. Soil Sci. 76, 387-393. Doi: 10.4141/cjss96-046spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFliebach, A., H.R. Oberholzer, L. Gunst y P. Mader. 2007. Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years of organic and conventional farming. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 118, 273-284. Doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.022spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGarcía, Y., W. Ramírez y S. Sánchez. 2012. Indicadores de la calidad de los suelos: una nueva manera de evaluar este recurso. Pastos Forrajes 35, 125-137.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGarcía-Ruiz, R., V. Ochoa, B. Vi-egla, M.B. Hinojosa, R. Pe-a-Santiago, G. Liébanas, J. Linares y J.A. Carreira. 2009. Soil enzymes, nematode community and selected physico-chemical properties as soil quality indicators in organic and conventional olive oil farming: Influence of seasonality and site features. Appl. Soil Ecol. 41, 305-314. Doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.12.004spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGiacometti, C., M.S. Demyan, L. Cavani, C. Marzadori, C. Ciavatta y E. Kandeler. 2013. Chemical and microbiological soil quality indicators and their potential to differentiate fertilization regimes in temperate agroecosystems. Appl. Soil Ecol. 64, 32-48. Doi: 10.1016/j. apsoil.2012.10.002spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGovaerts, B., K.D. Sayre y J. Deckers. 2006. A minimum data set for soil quality assessment of wheat and maize cropping in the highlands of Mexico. Soil Till. Res. 87, 163-74. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.03.005spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHatten, J.A. y D. Zabowski. 2010. Fire severity effects on soil organic matter from a ponderosa pine forest: a laboratory study. Int. J. Wildland Fire 19, 613-623. Doi: 10.1071/WF08048spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHünnemeyer, J.A., R. De Camino y S. Müller. 1997. Análisis del desarrollo sostenible en centroamérica: Indicadores para la agricultura y los recursos naturales. IICA/ GTZ, San José, Costa Ricaspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationImaz, M.J., I. Virto, P. Bescansa, A. Enrique, O. Fernandez- Ugalde y D.L. Karlen. 2010. Soil quality indicator response to tillage and residue management on semi-arid Mediterranean cropland. Soil Till. Res. 107, 17-25. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2010.02.003spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJamioi, D.D., J.C. Menjivar y Y. Rubiano. 2015. Indicadores químicos de calidad de suelos en sistemas productivos del Piedemonte de los Llanos Orientales de Colombia. Acta Agron. 64(4), 302-307.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKarlen, D.L., S.S. Andrews, B.J. Weinhold y J.W. Doran. 2003. Soil quality: Humankind’s foundation for survival. J. Soil Water Conserv. 58(4), 171-179.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKarlen, D.L., M.J. Mausbach, J.W. Doran, R.G. Cline, R.F. Harris y G.E. Schuman. 1997. Soil quality: a concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 4-10. Doi: 10.2136/ sssaj1997.03615995006100010001xspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKarlen, D.L., S.S. Andrews, B.J. Wienhold y T.M. Zobeck. 2008. Soil quality assessment: past, present and future. J. Int. Biosc. 6, 3-14.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKennard, D.K. y H.L. Gholz. 2001. Effects of high- and lowintensity fires on soil properties and plant growth in a Bolivian dry forest. Plant Soil 234, 119-129. Doi: 10.1023/A:1010507414994spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKhormali, F. y S. Shamsi. 2009. Micromorphology and quality attributes of the loess derived soils affected by land use change: A case study in Ghapan watershed, Northern Iran. J. Mt. Sci. 6, 197-204. Doi: 10.1007/ s11629-009-1037-zspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLal, R. 1998. Soil quality and agricultural sustainability. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI, USA.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLarson, W. E. y F.J. Pierce. 1991. Conservation and enhancement of soil quality. pp. 175-203. En: Evaluation for sustainable land management in the developing world. Vol. 2. IBSRAM Proc. 12(2). International Board for Soil Resources and Management. Bangkok, Tailandia.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLarson, W.E. y F.J. Pierce. 1994. The dynamics of soil quality as a measure of sustainable management. pp. 37- 52. En: Coleman, D.C., D.F. Bezdicek y B.A. Stewart (eds.). Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. Sol. Sci. Soc. Am., Special Publication No. 35. SSSA, Madison, WI, USA.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLee, C.H., M.Y. Wu, V.B. Asio y Z.S. Chen. 2006. Using a soil quality index to assess the effects of applying swine manure compost on soil quality under a crop rotation system in Taiwan. Soil Sci. 171, 210-222. Doi: 10.1097/01.ss.0000199700.78956.8cspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLentzsh, P., R. Wieland y S. Wirth. 2005. Application of multiple regression and neural network approaches for landscape-scale assessment of soil microbial biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 1577-1580. Doi: 10.1016/j. soilbio.2005.01.017spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMarinari, S., R. Mancinelli, E. Campiglia y S. Grego. 2006. Chemical and biological indicators of soil quality in organic and conventional farming systems in Central Italy. Ecol. Indic. 6(4), 701-711. Doi: 10.1016/j. ecolind.2005.08.029spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMubarak, A.R., O.M.E. Elshami y A.A. Azhari. 2005. Longand short-term effects of cultivation on properties of a Vertisol under sugarcane plantation. Soil Till. Res. 84, 1-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.08.005spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNeary, D.G., K.C. Ryan y L.F. DeBano. 2005. Wildland fire in ecosystems. Effects of fire on soil and water. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42-vol 4, Ogden, UT, USA.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOkonkwo, C.I. 2010. Effect of burning and cultivation on soil properties and microbial population of four different land use systems in Abakaliki. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 6(6), 1007-1014.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOliveira, S.P., D. Cândido, M.J. Weber, O.B. Xavier, F.A.S. Escobar y T.S. Oliveira. 2016. Conversion of forest into irrigated pasture I. Changes in the chemical and biological properties of the soil. Catena 137, 508-516. Doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.017spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationParsons, A., P. Robichaud, S. Lewis, C. Napper y J. Clark. 2010. Field guide for mapping post-fire soil burn severity. USDA For. Serv. Gen .Tech. Rep. RMRSGTR- 243. Washington D.C., USA.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationParr, J.F. y R.I. Papendick. 1997. Soil quality: relationship and strategies for sustainable dryland farming system. Ann. Arid Zone 36, 181-191.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPuglisi, E., A.A.M. Del Re, M.A. Rao y L. Gianfreda. 2006. Development and validation of numerical indexes integrating enzyme activities of soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 1673-1681. Doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.11.021spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSchoenholtz, S.H., H.V. Miegroet y J.A. Burger. 2000. A review of chemical and phys- ical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: challenges and opportunities. For. Ecol. Manag. 138, 335-356. Doi: 10.1016/ S0378-1127(00)00423-0spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSharma, K.L., U.K. Mandal, K. Srinivas, K.P.R. Vittal, B. Mandal, J.K. Grace y V. Ramesh. 2005. Long-term soil management effects on crop yields and soil quality in a dryland Alfisol. Soil Till. Res. 83, 246-259. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.08.002spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationShukla, M.K., R. Lal y M. Ebinger. 2006. Determining soil quality indicators by factor analysis. Soil Till. Res. 87, 194-204. Doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.03.011spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationShukla, M.K., R. Lal y M. Ebinger. 2004. Soil quality indicators for reclaimed minesoils in southeastern Ohio. Soil Sci. 169, 133-142. Doi: 10.1097/01. ss.0000117785.98510.0fspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSoil Quality Institute (SQI). 1996. Indicators for soil quality evaluation. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington D.C., USA.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTóth, G., V. Stolbovoy y L. Montanarella. 2007. Soil Quality and sustainability evaluation - An integrated approach to support soil-related policies of the European Union. Eur 22721. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationÚbeda, X. y L. Outeiro. 2009. Physical and chemical effects of fire on soil. pp. 105-132. En: Cerdà, A. y P.R. Robichaud (eds.). Fire effects on soils and restoration strategies. Science Publishers, Estfield, NH, USA. Doi: 10.1201/9781439843338-c4spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVega, J.A., T. Fontúrbel, A. Merino, C. Fernández, A. Ferreiro y E. Jiménez. 2013. Testing the ability of visual indicators of soil burn severity to reflect changes in soil chemical and microbial properties in pine forests and shrubland. Plant Soil 369(1-2), 73-91. Doi: 10.1007/ s11104-012-1532-9spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVisser, S. y D. Parkinson. 1992. Soil biological criteria as indicators of soil quality. Soil Microorg. 7, 25-31.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVose, J.M., W.T. Swank, B.D. Clinton, J.D. Knoepp y L.W. Swift. 1999. Using stand replacement fires to restore southern Appalachian pine-hardwood ecosystems: effects on mass, carbon, and nutrient pools. For Ecol. Manag. 114, 215-226. Doi: 10.1016/ S0378-1127(98)00352-1spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationYao, R., J. Yang, P. Gao, J. Zhang y W. Jin. 2013. Determining minimum data set for soil quality assessment of typical salt-affected farmland in the coastal reclamation area. Soil Till. Res. 128, 137-148. Doi: 10.1016/j. still.2012.11.007spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZornoza, R., J. Mataix-Solera, C. Guerrero, V. Arcenegui, F. García-Orenes, J. Mataix-Beneyto y A. Morugán. 2007. Evaluation of soil quality using multiple lineal regression based on physical, chemical and biochemical properties. Sci. Total Environ. 378(1-2), 233-237. Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.052spa
dc.description.notesBibliografía: páginas 456-458.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.dcmi-type-vocabularyTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.description.abstractenglishThe need to understand and evaluate the quality of soils in agricultural production systems is an issue of increasing importance today because of the determination of impacts from management practices on the sustainability of this resource. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the concept of soil quality and indicators for its evaluation and to present some research on the potential of chemical properties for use as indicators of soil quality. Among the chemical properties that can be considered as indicators are nutrient availability, organic carbon content and labile organic carbon, pH, phosphate binding capacity, electrical conductivity, cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen and mineralizable and organic matter. The importance of multivariate techniques to define chemical properties with a potential as soil quality indicators is highlighted. The greatest concern for the sustainable use of soil resources includes the need to develop approaches and tools that generate diagnoses for the effects of management practices implemented in the systems of agricultural production, that is, to provide information about soil quality in a given context.spa
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2017v11i2.5719-
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadasspa
dc.subject.armarcQuímica de suelos-
dc.subject.armarcConservación de suelos-
dc.subject.armarcSuelos - Análisis-
dc.subject.armarcReconocimiento de suelos - Investigaciones-
dc.subject.armarcEdafología-
dc.subject.armarcAgrosaviaspa
dc.subject.proposalEvaluación de calidad de suelospa
dc.subject.proposalInterrelación de propiedades edáficasspa
dc.subject.proposalSistemas agrícolasspa
Appears in Collections:Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PPS_1477.pdfArchivo principal398.04 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons