Influencia de las dimensiones de las ramas de árboles forrajeros en el aprovechamiento por rumiantes

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSantana Pérez, Angel Arturo
dc.contributor.authorBorrás Sandoval, Luis Miguel
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Long
dc.contributor.authorVerdecia Acosta, Danis Manuel
dc.contributor.authorIglesias Gómez, Jesús Manuel
dc.contributor.authorVega Albi, Ana Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorRamírez de la Ribera, Jorge Luis
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T15:22:24Z
dc.date.available2019-09-10T15:22:24Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-01
dc.description1 recurso en línea (páginas 25-38)spa
dc.description.abstractTo determine the stem measurements (length and diameter) up to which forage trees (Leucaena leucocephala, LL; Albizia lebbeck, AL; Gliricidia sepium, GS; Moringa oleifera, MO; Samanea saman, SS) are consumed by cattle and sheep (young or adult), these foliages were daily offered to the animals and the minimal diameters of the refused branches were measured (maximal diameter of the eaten fragment). More than 300 dimensions of stem length vs. its corresponding diameter were paired. It was done a triple analysis of variance (5x2x2) being the factors: forage species, animal species and animal age. A simple regression analysis was done between length and diameter of the stalks, as well as a probability test of Z to consider 5% refuse of the foliage by the animals. The results showed that the diameters of the eaten stems are different for each foliage species, being GS>LL>MO>SS>AL, this means that each one has to be cut at a different dimension, this cut must be different for cattle and sheep, but not between ages of them and that sheep do not consume any stem of SS and GS. Finally, it is recommended the exact dimensions of the stems (diameter and length) to cut each species and the evaluation methodology to be used for other fodder evaluations.eng
dc.description.abstractCon el fin de determinar la longitud y el diámetro máximos hasta que son consumidos los tallos de especies arbustivas (Leucaena leucocephala, LL; Albizia lebbeck, AL; Gliricidia sepium, GS; Moringa oleifera, MO; Samanea saman, SS) por bovinos y ovinos (jóvenes y adultos), se suministraron follajes a los animales y se midieron los diámetros mínimos de las porciones de las ramas desechadas por estos (máximos diámetros de las porciones consumidas). Se parearon más de 300 mediciones de longitud/diámetro de los tallos. Se realizó un análisis de varianza triple “especie del forraje x especie de animal x edad del animal” (5x2x2), un análisis de regresión simple entre la longitud del tallo y su diámetro y una prueba de Z, para una pérdida máxima de 5 % del follaje por los animales. Existieron diferencias entre los diámetros máximos de los tallos consumidos, siendo el orden general GS>LL>MO>SS>AL, por tanto, cada especie debe ser cortada en dimensiones diferentes. También se observó que los ovinos no consumen los tallos de SS y GS. Se aconseja que el corte no sea igual para bovinos y ovinos, pero se puede ignorar la edad de estos. Además se recomienda tener en cuenta los valores exactos de las dimensiones de los tallos para cortar las especies para cada especie de animal y que se emplee esta misma metodología para evaluar otras especies de forrajes.spa
dc.description.notesBibliografía y webgrafía: páginas 36-38.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.citationSantana Pérez, A. A. y otros. (2019). Influencia de las dimensiones de las ramas de árboles forrajeros en el aprovechamiento por rumiantes. Revista Ciencia y Agricultura, 16(2), 25-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01228420.v16.n2.2019.9118. http://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2841spa
dc.identifier.doi10.19053/01228420.v16.n2.2019.9118
dc.identifier.issn2539-0899
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2841
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiaspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Ciencia y Agricultura;Volumen 16, número 2 (Mayo-Agosto 2019)spa
dc.relation.referencesACPA-SOCUPER (2002). Ovino Pelibuey: Manual. Cuba: Asociación Cubana de Producción Animal.spa
dc.relation.referencesAgreil, C., Fritz, H., & Meuret, M. (2005). Maintenance of Daily Intake through Bite Mass Diversity Adjustment in Sheep Grazing on Heterogeneous and Variable Vegetation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 91(1-2), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.029.spa
dc.relation.referencesAregheore, E. M. (2003). Nutritional Characterization and Evaluation of Batiki Grass (Ischaemum aristatum var. indicum) and Batiki Grass-Legume Mixtures with Steer Calves. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2(7), 404-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4488(03)00198-6.spa
dc.relation.referencesAvendaño, J., Ovalle, C. M., & Ramírez, M. (2003). Caracterización de los componentes vegetales consuidos por ovinos y bovinos en plantas de Tagasaste (Chamaecytisus proliferus ssp. palmensis). Agricultura Técnica, 63(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0365-28072003000100006.spa
dc.relation.referencesBonnet, O. J. F., Meuret, M., Tischler, M. R., Cezimbra, I. M., Azambuja, J. C. R., & Carvalho, P. C. F. (2015). Continuous Bite Monitoring: A Method to Assess the Foraging Dynamics of Herbivores in Natural Grazing Conditions. Animal Production Science, 55(3), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14540.spa
dc.relation.referencesCáceres, O., & González, E. (2000). Metodología para la determinación del valor nutritivo de los forrajes tropicales. Pastos y Forrajes, 23(2), 87-103.spa
dc.relation.referencesClark, A., 2000. Controlling broom (Cytisus scoparius) in pasture on the Barrington Tops—a graziers perspective. Plant Protection Quarterly, 15, 161-162.spa
dc.relation.referencesDelgado, D.C., Hera, R., Cairo, J. & Orta, Y. (2014). Samanea saman, a multi-purpose tree with potentialities as alternative feed for animals of productive interest. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 48(3), 205-212.spa
dc.relation.referencesDziba, L. E., Scogings, P. F., Gordon, I. J., & Raats, J. G. (2003). Effects of Season and Breed on Browse Species Intake Rates and Diet Selection by Goats in the False Thornveld of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Small Ruminant Research, 47(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00235-3.spa
dc.relation.referencesFAO-UNESCO (1988). Soil Map of the World. Revised Legend. World Soil Resources. Rome, Italy: FAO-UNESCO.spa
dc.relation.referencesFisher, D. S. (2002). A Review of a Few Key Factors Regulating Voluntary Feed Intake in Ruminants. Crop Science, 42(5), 1651-1655. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1651.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlores, G., Amor J., Resch, C., & González, A. (2000). Valor nutritivo del ensilaje de hierba en las explotaciones ganaderas de Galicia. Pastos, 30(2), 149-191.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlores, S. J., Vermont-Ricalde, M. R., & Kantún-Balam, M. J. (2006). Leguminosae Diversity in the Yucatan Peninsula and its Importance for Sheep and Goats Feeding. In C.A. Sandoval-Castro, F.D. Hovel, J.F.J. Torres-Acosta & A. Ayala-Burgos (eds.). Herbivores: The Assessment of Intake, Digestibility and the Roles of Secondary Compounds. 291-299. Nottingham, United Kingdom: Nottingham University Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesForbes J. M. (2000). Physiological and Metabolic Aspects of Feed Intake Control. In J.P.F. D´Mello (ed), Farm Animal Metabolism Nutrition. United Kingdom: CAB International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993782.0319spa
dc.relation.referencesFunes, F., & Jordán, H. (1987). Leche. En T. Ruiz (Ed.). Leucaena, una opción para la alimentación bovina en el trópico y el subtrópico. Ed. Instituto de Ciencia Animal. Cuba: 129 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, D. E., Medina, M. G., & Ojeda, F. (2005). Carbohidratos solubles en cuatro variedades de morera (Morus alba Linn.). Pastos y Forrajes, 28(3), 233-239.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, R. & O. Cáceres. (1984). Nuevos sistemas para expresar el valor nutritivo de los alimentos y el requerimiento y racionamiento de los rumiantes. EEPF “Indio Hatuey”, Matanzas. Cuba. 44 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesGeisert, B. G. (2007). Development of a Set of Forage Standard to Estimate in vivo Digestibility of Forages and Prediction of Forage Quality of Diets Consumed by Cattle Grazing Nebraska Sandhills Range Pastures. (Tesis de Doctorado). University of Nebraska, Lincoln. USA. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/animalscidiss/2.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-García, E., Cáceres, O., Archimède, H., & Santana, H. (2009). Nutritive Value of Edible Forage from Two Leucaena leucocephala Cultivars with Different Growth Habit and Morphology. Agroforestry Systems, 77(2), 131-141. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9188-4.spa
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Pech, P. G., Torres-Acosta, J. F., & Sandoval-Castro, J. (2014). Adapting a Bite Coding Grid for Small Ruminants Browsing a Deciduous Tropical Forest. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 17, 63-70.spa
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez, O., Delgado, D., Oramas, A., & Cairo, J. (2005). Consumo y digestibilidad de materia seca y nitrógeno total en vacas en pastoreo durante la época de lluvias, con bancos de proteína y sin ellos. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 39(4), 593-597. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v7.n2.2015.264.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández, I., & Sánchez, M. D. (2014). Small Ruminant Management and Feeding with High Quality Forages in the Caribbean. Santo Domingo, República Dominicana: IICA.spa
dc.relation.referencesIglesias, J. M., Matías, C., & Pérez, A. (2003). Cría de hembras bovinas en desarrollo en condiciones de silvopastoreo. Pastos y Forrajes, 26(1), 35-46.spa
dc.relation.referencesIngram, R.S., Doran, M.P. & Nader, G. (2013). Planned Herbivory in the Management of Wildfire Fuels In B. Barros & M.E.B. Fernandes (eds.), Herbivory InTech. 61-86. Rijeka. Croacia. https://doi.org/10.5772/2718.spa
dc.relation.referencesKapinga, P. X., Bitende, S. N., & Mulangila, R. C. T. (1993). Evaluation of Sesbania sesban and Sesbania goetzei Accessions in Subhumid Coastal Area of Tanga, Tanzania. En J. Ndikumana & P. de-Leeuw (eds), Proceedings of the Second African Feed Resources Network, 46-51. Zimbabwe: Harare.spa
dc.relation.referencesKarsli, M. A., & Russell, J. R. (2002). Prediction of the Voluntary Intake and Digestibility of Forage-Based Diets from Chemical Composition and Ruminal Degradation Characteristics. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 26, 249-255.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaca, E. A., Shipley, L. A., & Reid, E. D. (2001). Structural Anti-Quality Characteristics of Range and Pasture Plants. Journal of Range Management, 54(4), 413-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003112.spa
dc.relation.referencesLowry, J. B. (1990). Toxic Factors and Problems: Methods of Alleviating them in Animals. En: C. Devendra (ed.), Proceedings of a workshop in Denpasar, 76-91. Indonesia.spa
dc.relation.referencesMarais, J. P. (2000). Use of Markers. En J.P.F. D´Mello (ed.), Farm Animal Metabolism Nutrition, 255-277. United Kingdom: CAB International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993782.0255.spa
dc.relation.referencesNRC (2005). Mathematics and 21st Century Biology. Committee on Mathematical Sciences Research for DOE’s Computational Biology, National Research Council. Recuperado de: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11315.html.spa
dc.relation.referencesMathews, G. L., & Ellinbank, G. A. C. (1989). Utilization of Tagasaste. Tagasaste, Research Results and Farmer Experiences. Small Ruminant Research, 59(2-3), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.05.003spa
dc.relation.referencesParissi, Z. M., & Nastis, A. S. (2007). Nutritive Value of White Oak (Quercus pubescens Wild.) Browsed by Goats. In A. Priolo, L. Biondi, H. Ben Salem, H. & P. Morand-Fehr (eds.), Advanced Nutrition and Feeding Strategies to Improve Sheep and Goat, 193-196. Zaragoza: CIHEAM.spa
dc.relation.referencesPaterson, R. T., Quiroga, L., Sauma, G., & Samur, C. (1983). Crecimiento de novillas Cebú-Criollo en la época de seca con acceso limitado a la Leucaena. Producción Animal, 8, 150-162.spa
dc.relation.referencesPontes, L. S., Agreil, C., Magda, D., Gleizes, B., & Fritz, H. (2010). Feeding Behavior of Sheep on Shrubs in Response to Contrasting Herbaceous Cover in Rangelands Dominated by Cytisus scoparius L. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 124(1-2), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.02.002.spa
dc.relation.referencesProvenza, F. D., & Ropp, J. (2001). Understanding Herbivore Response to anti-Quality Factors in Forages. In K. Launchbaugh (ed.), Antiquality Factors in Rangeland and Pastureland Forages, 5-12. USDA: Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_jrm_v54i4_launchbaugh.spa
dc.relation.referencesSantana, A. A., Pernía, L. A., & Santana, D. A. (2015). Historical, Mathematical and Nutritional Bases of Pearson Square as a Fit Method for Ruminant Rations. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 49(3), 279-288.spa
dc.relation.referencesSebata, A., & Ndlovu, L. R. (2010). Effect of Leaf Size, Thorn Density and Leaf Accessibility on Instantaneous Intake Rates of Five Woody Species Browsed by Matebele Goats (Capra hircus L) in a Semi-Arid Savanna, Zimbabwe. Journal of Arid Environment, 74(10), 1281-1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.05.028spa
dc.relation.referencesSebata, A. 2013. Woody Plant-Herbivore Interactions in Semi-Arid Savanna Ecosystems. En B. Barros & M.E.B. Fernandes (eds.), Herbivory InTech, 1-17. Rijeka. Croacia. https://doi.org/10.5772/2718.spa
dc.relation.referencesValenciaga, D. & Chongo, B. (2004). La pared celular. Influencia de su naturaleza en la degradación microbiana ruminal de los forrajes. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 38(4), 343-350.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhite, D. A., & Hood, C. S. (2004). Vegetation Patterns and Environmental Gradients in Tropical Dry Forest of the Northern Yucatan Peninsula. Journal Vegetation Science, 15(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02250.xspa
dc.relation.referencesWilson, S. L., & Kerley, G. I. H. (2003). Bite Diameter Selection by Thicket Browsers: The Effect of Body Size and Plant Morphology on Forage Intake and Quality. Forest Ecology and Management, 181(1-2), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00114-2.spa
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2019 Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/9118/7620spa
dc.subject.armarcNutrición animal
dc.subject.armarcPlantas forrajeras
dc.subject.armarcAlimentos para animales
dc.subject.armarcAgrosaviaspa
dc.subject.proposalConsumospa
dc.subject.proposalFollajespa
dc.subject.proposalMedidasspa
dc.subject.proposalTallosspa
dc.titleInfluencia de las dimensiones de las ramas de árboles forrajeros en el aprovechamiento por rumiantesspa
dc.title.alternativeEffects of branch dimensions of fodder trees on their utilization by ruminantseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PPS_1442_Influencia_dimension_ramas_arboles.pdf
Size:
532.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Archivo principal
Descargar
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
14.45 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Descargar
Collections
Revista Ciencia y Agricultura