Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCandian, Joara Secchi
dc.contributor.authorRedígolo, Mateus Vinicius Narciso
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Walter Luiz de Proença
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Antonio Ismael Inácio
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T15:11:34Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T15:11:34Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-06
dc.identifier.citationCandian, J. S. y otros. (2017). Yield of chicory ‘Folha larga’ and ‘Pão de açúcar’ according to planting density. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas, 11(2), 322-328. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2017v11i2.7351. http://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2864spa
dc.identifier.issn2422-3719
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2864
dc.description1 recurso en línea (páginas 322-328) : ilustraciones color.spa
dc.description.abstractLa densidad de planta influye directamente en el potencial productivo de los cultivos y la mejor puede no ser la misma para todos. Debido a la falta de investigación en esta línea con achicoria, con el objetivo de estudiar el efecto de la densidad de plantas sobre el rendimiento de los dos cultivares de achicoria, de Folha Larga y Pão de Açúcar. Se evaluaron siete densidades de plantas (444.444, 370.370, 333.333, 277.778, 266.667, 222.222 y 185.185 plantas/ha), en un diseño de bloques al azar con cuatro repeticiones. Se evaluaron el peso fresco, altura de planta, número de hojas y la rendimiento. A pesar de la densidad no influyó en altura de la planta, había una disminución en el peso fresco y el número de hojas por planta y hubo un aumento de la rendimiento de los dos cultivares de mayor densidad.spa
dc.description.abstractPlant density directly influences the productive potential of crops, and the best density is not the same for all cultivars. Because of a lack of research in this area with chicory, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of plant density on the production of two chicory cultivares, Folha Larga and Pão de Açúcar. Seven planting densities were evaluated (444,444; 370,370; 333,333; 277,778; 266,667; 222,222 and 185,185 plants/ha); the experiment design used a randomized block design with four replications. The fresh weight, plant height, leaf number and yield were evaluated. Despite the fact that density did not influence plant height, mass reduction was observed in the fresh weight and number of leaves per plant and there was an increase in yield of both cultivars with the higher density.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiaspa
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2017 Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiaspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/7351/pdfspa
dc.titleYield of chicory ‘Folha larga’ and ‘Pão de açúcar’ according to planting densityspa
dc.title.alternativeRendimiento de achicoria ‘Folha larga’ y ‘Pão de açúcar’ en función de la densidad de plantaciónspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.description.notesBibliografía: páginas 327-328.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.identifier.doi10.17584/rcch.2017v11i2.7351
dc.relation.referencesBezerra Neto, F., A.P. Barros Júnior, E.O. Silva, M.Z. Negreiros, E.Q. Oliveira, L.M. Silveira, M.J.T. Câmara, and G.H.S. Nunes. 2006. Qualidade nutricional de cenoura e alface cultivadas em Mossoró-RN em função da densidade populacional. Hortic. Bras. 24, 476-480. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-05362006000400016spa
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho, L.B. and C.D. Guzzo. 2008. Increased beet density in weed management. Planta Daninha 26, 73-82. Doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582008000100008spa
dc.relation.referencesCastoldi, R., E.A. André, L.T. Braz, and H.C.O. Charlo. 2012. Performance of cultivars of crisp mini-lettuce with respect to ground cover and spacing, in three planting times. Acta Hortic. 936, 379-384. Doi: 10.17660/ ActaHortic.2012.936.50spa
dc.relation.referencesCorrêa, C.V., A.I.I Cardoso, L.G. Souza, W.L.P. Antunes, and L.A. Magolbo, 2014. Yield of beet depending on spacing. Hortic. Bras. 32, 140-144.spa
dc.relation.referencesCunha, A.R. and D. Martins. 2009. Classificação climática para os municípios de Botucatu e São Manoel, SP. Irriga 14, 1-11. Doi: 10.15809/irriga.2009v14n1p01spa
dc.relation.referencesFerreira, D.F. 2011. Sisvar - Sistema de análise de variância. Versão 5.3. 2011. UFLA, Lavras-MG, Brazil.spa
dc.relation.referencesFilgueira, F.A.R. 2008. Novo manual de olericultura: agrotecnologia moderna na produção e comercialização de hortaliças. 3rd ed. Ed. UFV, Viçosa, Brazil.spa
dc.relation.referencesFlesch, R.D. and L.C. Vieira. 2004. Spacing and plant populations of hybrids with different cycles in the west of Santa Catarina, Brasil. Ciência Rural 34(1), 25-31. Doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782004000100005spa
dc.relation.referencesGodoi, R.S., J.L. Andriolo, J.C.C. Madalóz, D.I. Janisch, and C.A.P. Barros. 2007. Growth and yield of chicory plants under total N concentrations containing NH4 + in the nutrient solution. Ciência Rural 37, 1170-1173. Doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782007000400043spa
dc.relation.referencesLopes, W.A.R., M.Z Negreiros, T.M.S. Teófilo, S.S.V. Alves, C.M. Martins, G.H.S Nunes, and L.C. Grangeiro. 2008. Produtividade de cultivares de cenoura sob diferentes densidades de plantio. Rev. Ceres 55(5), 482-487.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoniruzzaman, M. 2006. Effects of plant spacing and mulching on yield and profitability of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). J. Agric. Rural Dev. 4, 107-111.spa
dc.relation.referencesNovo, M.C.S.S., P.E. Trani, and K. Minami. 2003. Performance of three chicory cultivars grown in greenhouse. Hortic. Bras. 21(1), 84-87.spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira, A.P., J.A. Silva, A.N.P. Oliveira, D.F. Silva, R.R. Santos, and N.V. Silva. 2010. Gherkin yield influenced by spacing between rows and between plants in a row. Hortic. Bras. 28(3), 344-347. Doi: 10.1590/ S0102-05362010000300017spa
dc.relation.referencesOliveira, R.G., L.F.O.S. Rodrigues, S. Seabra Jr., M.B. Silva, M.T.R. Nohama, A.M. Inagaki, and M.C.M. Nunes. 2011. Performance of lettuce cultivars in different densities under greenhouse and open field. Hortic. Bras. 29, 110-118.spa
dc.relation.referencesPereira, A.V., R.F. Otto, and M.Y. Reghin. 2003. Respostas do feijão-vagem cultivado sob proteção com agrotêxtil em duas densidades de plantas. Hortic. Bras. 21(3) 564-569. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-05362003000300030spa
dc.relation.referencesPôrto, D.R.Q., A.B. Cecílio Filho, B.L.A Rezende, A.P Barros Júnior, and G.S. Silva. 2012. Population density and planting time on the growth and yield of cauliflower cv. Verona. Caatinga 25, 92-98.spa
dc.relation.referencesPurquerio, L.F.V., L.A.R. Demant, R. Goto, and R.L. Villas -Boas. 2007. Effect of side dressing nitrogen fertilization and distance between plants on yield of rocket salad. Hortic. Bras. 25, 464-470. Doi: 10.1590/ S0102-05362007000300028spa
dc.relation.referencesRaij, B.V., H. Cantarella, J.A. Quaggio, and A.M.C. Furlani. 1997. Recomendações de adubação e calagem para o estado de São Paulo. 2nd ed. Instituto Agronômico e Fundação IAC, Campinas, Brazil.spa
dc.relation.referencesSantos, F., P.E., M.C.S.S. Trani Novo, and F.A. Passos. 2013. Agronomic performance of four chicory cultivars. Hortic. Bras. 31, 153-156. Doi: 10.1590/ S0102-05362013000100024spa
dc.relation.referencesSilva, G.S., A.B. Cecílio Filho, J.C. Barbosa, and A.U. Alves. 2011. Growth and yield of red cabbage as affected by distances between rows and plants. Bragantia 70, 538- 543. Doi: 10.1590/S0006-87052011000300008spa
dc.relation.referencesTaiz, L. and E. Zeiger. 2004. Fisiologia vegetal. Artmed, Porto Alegre, Brazil.spa
dc.relation.referencesTakahashi, K. and A.I.I. CardosoI. 2014. Plant density in production of mini lettuce cultivars in organic system management. Hortic. Bras. 32, 342-347. Doi: 10.1590/ S0102-05362014000300017spa
dc.relation.referencesTrani, P.E., H. Nagai, F.A. Passos, and J.A. Azevedo Filho. 1996. Alface, almeirão, chicória, escarola, rúcula e agrião d’água. In: Raij, J.B. van, H. Cantarella, J.A. Quaggio, and A.M.C. Furlani (eds.). Recomendações de adubação e calagem para o Estado de São Paulo. IAC Boletim Técnico 100, 168-169. Instituto Agronômico, Campinas, Brazil. Doi: 10.1590/ S0102-05362014000300017spa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.subject.armarcAchicoria: Cichorium intybus L.
dc.subject.armarcPlantas medicinales - Cultivo
dc.subject.armarcAgrosaviaspa
dc.subject.proposalCichorium intybus L.spa
dc.subject.proposalFresh weightspa
dc.subject.proposalSpacingspa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas;Volumen 11, número 2 (Julio-Diciembre 2017)spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright (c) 2017 Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright (c) 2017 Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia